Some catching up to do...

During the month of June, I moved. During the month of July, my ceiling collapsed, and I finally got my "place" back a week ago. So, I may not have kept the best track of my movie watching, but I'll try...

My Super Ex-Girlfriend - Harmless.
Shock Treatment - Good soundtrack, but useless movie.
A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge - Not the worst the in series, but it was until part 5.
War - Much more lame than a Jason Statham/Jet Li movie should be.
Wall-E - So cute.
Gremlins 2 - Probably not better than the original. But funnier.
Hellboy 2: The Golden Army - Beautifully made, but not much staying power.
Wanted - Fun but terribly uneven.
Hancock - The first half is hilarious. The second half needs work.
Forgetting Sarah Marshall - Very funny. Kristen Bell is hot, but God bless Jason Segel.
The Dark Knight - Oooooh... although Imax loses something when it shuts down during the film. Twice.
Epic Movie - I laughed once. Once.
The Descent - I think the HBO version is different than the DVD version. Or I may be crazy. Eh.
Tropic Thunder - Very funny at times, but it's too Ben Stiller. And I like Ben Stiller. I may expand more on this later.

What I've Seen

Here are the movies I've seen since the last time I updated:

Vertigo (on the big screen)
Them!
American History X
Spider-Man 3
Walk Hard
Across the Universe
Iron Man
The Third Man
This Film is Not Yet Rated
Gremlins
The Frighteners
Raiders of the Lost Ark
Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
Kindergarten Cop
The Cable Guy
Citizen X
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

None of them were really good (at least not unexpectedly) and none were really bad. I'd write a bit about them, but I'm tired and packing. Maybe later.

March madness

Here are the movies I have watched since my last post:

The Science of Sleep
Balls of Fury
Knocked Up
Top Secret!
Creepshow
Funny Games
I Am Legend
Beowulf (kind of)
Shoot 'Em Up
Mr. Magorium's Wonder Emporium (most of it)
The Crying Game
The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen
OSS-117: Cairo, Nest of Spies
Bon Cop, Bad Cop
Ultraviolet

So, I've watched lots of movies of all sorts. Silly comedies, controversial action, bad comic adaptations, neo-classics, film fest movies and even kids movies. None of them are ones I can wholeheartedly endorse, but there are plenty to recommend. I of course love Shoot 'Em Up, and OSS-117 is pretty dang funny. Bon Cop was a nice Canadian action comedy, and I really enjoyed what I saw of Magorium.

But the one that struck me hardest was Funny Games, although neither in a good way or bad way. The film is controversial in it's no-holds-barred look at the audience that watches these movies. So, essentially, it's a movie about me. Some people can't finish it, and some people (weird people) would love it. I fell into neither category. The truth is, it was just kind of there. I liked Michael Pitt's performance a lot, but I didn't get sick, wasn't worried about the characters. I liked a lot of the flourishes, too, including the hyped fourth-wall breaking and the "rewinding." So, why did it stick with me? Because it didn't bother me. That probably because I knew what I was getting in to, and because even though I am very fond of life, both mine and other people's, I recognized the characters as actors, and wasn't fazed. In other words, I'm bothered by the fact that it didn't bother me.

Foot wounds...

I just watched The Monster Squad, a not quite classic of my generation, but one that I fondly remembered if only for the 'Kick him in the nards!" - "Wolfmen don't have nards!" - KICK - "Wolfmen have nards" line. The movie was written by Shane Black and director Fred Dekker, which came as a suprise, since I am at least a half-hearted fan of Mr. Black. As much as there was some good stuff and humorous moments in the film, I was totally flabbergasted by the questionable nature of the kids movie, such as the overt sexual themes, rampant swearing, and disregarded "marriage counseling" sideplot. As much as I'd like to blame these things on Dekker (who I don't know), I think these parts were probably written by Black, given that he wrote Lethal Weapon that same year. It's sad really, because it could have been a pretty classic movie for the kids had it not shot itself in the foot. Repeatedly.

I also watched Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? and Breakfast at Tiffany's, both for the first time. So while we're on the subject of movies that I didn't like, allow me to pounce on these two. Actually, I did like Baby Jane, although a plot twist in the finale sucked, and may have ruined the movie for me. But I was far more displeased with Tiffany's. Most people like to point to Mickey Rooney as the film's Achille's Heel, but I really think he's just the most noticeable part of the problem. Let's be frank, were Audrey Hepburn not as cute and watchable as she was, the movie would be an utter waste of time. I can't care about any of the people in this movie. I don't like them. I found the ending happy only in that these people wouldn't bother anybody else for the rest of their lives. It's two hours of watching people I don't like pretending to be important so that they can marry other people I don't like, in a plot that is pretty much spelled out for you during the first ten minutes. So, Hepburn aside, what is there to like about the movie? Anybody?

faelwena

So, have I stopped watching movies, or just stopped reviewing them? A little of both, really. I watched La Haine, Matthieu Kassovitz's teen gangland French flick in early January, and wrote my review. Since then, I've seen ten movies, and didn't write about one of them. They were:

Once
Shoot'em Up
Supergirl
Nighthawks
The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada
Ratatouille
There Will be Blood
Vengeance is Mine
Masters of the Universe
Juno (second time)
Gone Baby Gone

Instead of reviews, here is a quick snapshot: I am still very pleased with Juno, an iffy opening five minutes being the only drawback, really. And There Will Be Blood is fascinating, memorable greatness...almost. It's too long, with too many subplots, but it's infinitely watchable thank to Daniel Day-Lewis. Supergirl was kind of lame, and Masters was really lame. But they were childhood favorites, so what do you expect?

Three Burials was really odd and awkward. But I enjoyed it's simpleness, and it's straightforwardness. It was a movie that didn't seem to be going anywhere, and was interestingly touching on its way there. Even moreso, though, for Once, which was an abnormal heart-tugger. I'll probably forget Three Burials because of Once in a few months, despite the fact that one is really nothing like the other.

Likewise, kudos to Gone, Baby, Gone and (ulp...) director Ben Affleck. That film also feels honest and straightforward, never losing sight of what it wants to be. Okay, maybe it slips a little at the end, but at least it leads to a moment that is the necessary finale given its intentions. It will probably never be a classic, but I liked it enough.

That's all the movie news so far this year. For TV, I've been inexplicably drawn to Celebrity Apprentice, my first reality show hook. Or maybe not, as I missed last week, and haven't really noticed. I tried watching the second season of Deadwood, but got distracted and haven't looked back yet. (No such problems with the second season of Rome, oddly enough). And recently, I've gone crazy for Doctor Who, which given the per-DVD cost, would be akin to being hooked on crack, were it not for Madison Public Library and a lucky find at Half Price Books. Doctor Who: Probably the greatest reason to still own a VCR.

Closing out the film year (about a week late)

300 – Doesn’t work as well on the small screen, but it’s an pretty good guy flick anyway.

Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead – Ethan Hawk and Phillip Seymour Hoffamn are a pair of brothers down on their luck when they decide to rob their parent jewelry store. Things go horribly wrong, though, and the pair has to find a way to live with the consequences, which spiral out of control. Sidney Lumet’s film is engaging and features great performances throughout. I’ll probably never see it again, but I enjoyed every minute of it.

The Bourne Ultimatum – The third entry in the series is more of the same: high class, glossy action. As technically proficient as the previous two films, it has a lot of non-stop dramatic action. It also boasts two exceptionally good action sequences, which alone are enough to recommend it. The Bourne series may never be one of my favorites, but they are still really good and recommendable.

Bowfinger – This kinda funny Steve Martin/Eddie Murphy flick is hilarious at times, but not really often enough to make it a must-see. It works best when it sticks to the main plot of the movie, a movie star being secretly filmed for a low-budget film, it's just a bit murky when it veers into any of its tangents.

Casino Royale – Still excellent, and one of the best Bond movies in years, if not the best Bond ever.

Crawlspace – Klaus Kinski is a Nazi landlord who spies on and torments his female tenants. It’s not as good as a typical psychological horror film, but its better than the typical slasher flick. It hangs somewhere in between as a curious, if not entirely successful, cult horror film.

Enchanted – Disney gets all meta when a fairy tale prince and princess end up in the real New York City. Amy Adams is kind of annoying (although she gets better) and James Marsden is hilarious (although he starts to wear thin). The wearing thin motif actually runs through the film, as the end gets a bit ridiculous, and a few too many jokes are repeated a bit too much. All in all though, it’s very enjoyable, and I can only imagine how awesome it would be were I not a 31-year old male.

Dazed and Confused – Richard Linklater’s ode to high school in the 70’s is all over the place, but in a beautiful way. It’s funny, nostalgic and energetic, and it makes me wish, at least in a way, that I was alive to have experienced that time. If you weren’t, this is about as close as you can get.

Ghost Rider – Terrible movie. Bad writing, acting, directing and effects all work together to hamper what may have, in an alternate universe, been okay at best. Nicolas Cage is daredevil who turns into a flaming-headed gopher for the devil. It’s worse than it sounds, and if the comic had been this bad, it wouldn’t have reached the first printing.

Hitman - Muddy and overly complicated, the video-game-turned-feature-film has plenty of operatic violence and style, even if it’s rather stupid and unorignal. It’s epic battle scenes pale in comparison to similar films, and its few attempts at humor don’t stop it from being a mostly joyless popcorn flick. Easily missable.

The Host – A Japanese monster movie that earned great raves, it’s got odd moments which seem to right at home given Asian humor, and although it’s not actually scary, it’s still hella entertaining. When a creature emerges from a nearby river and makes off with a little girl, the family takes justice into their own hands to try and get her back. It’s got a less-than-positive view of the government (theirs and ours), which helps it to feel like a monster movie with a point. But even if you don’t care for political commentary, there’s plenty to see here.

Hostel Part 2 – An intriguing sequel to the cool original, this time the film spends as much time with the villains as with the victims. It’s heavy gornography, and it’s the sick kind of disturbing rather than the awesome kind, but it’s still miles above most of it’s competitors, including the Saw series, mainly due to its macabre sense of humor. It’s not as effective as the original, but it has its own niche nonetheless.

Juno – A bittersweet and wonderful movie. Juno (Emily Page) is a 16-year old who ends up pregnant, and has to figure out what to do with the baby, hoping that she’s grown up enough to give it to the couple who can’t conceive, and that they are parental enough to take it. It’s occasionally hilarious, but otherwise sad, for a nice combination of sweetness and honesty. It’s a great film.

Little Miss Sunshine – Occasionally hilarious and usually charming disfunctional family road pic. Good enough for it’s cult status, it’s kind of wonderful.

Live Free or Die Hard – This works less on the small screen than on the big one, though that could be because I knew what was coming, or it may be that I was semi-preoccupied with an 11-week old charmer. Whatever the case, it’s still a good entry into the saga.

M:I 3 – JJ Abrams has his roots in TV, so it’s no surprise that the film is a little soft on the edges. It’s not nearly as good as the original, but it’s still pretty exciting on occasion. On the other hand, I bet the movie really shines when it finally makes it to network television.

No Country for Old Men – I had high hopes for this one, which may explain why I was less than impressed. The movie kept me rapt until near the very end, when a major plot point is oddly skipped. After that, things wander aimlessly, wax philosophically, and just kind of drag. Shame, too, since up until that point, I was engrossed, impressed, and actually very nervous. Whatever the case, the Coen brothers return the genre that has treated them so ridiculously well in the past with technical bravado and a uniformly terrific cast.

Planet Terror – The lesser half of the Grindhouse double feature is probably best watched on the small screen late at night, when it can serve as a great reminder of the early days of the VCR and crappy cinema. For crappy cinema, it’s a good movie, but it suffers from huge amounts of Rodriguez overkill.

Popeye – Amazing production and semi-memorable songs strongly outshine the screenplay in Robert Altman’s live action adaptation of the famous cartoons. It’s great for families and nostalgia seekers, but lacks a bit for everyone else.

Poseidon – I celebrated New Years with Wolfgang Petersen’s acceptable remake. It’s interesting enough, and offers enough “Who Will Live” surprises to be worth watching at least once.

Running Scared – A gopher for the mafia accidentally loses a key piece of evidence when a gun used to kill corrupt cops is used by the ten-year-old boy next door. Now he has to track down both the boy and the gun (which end up all over town) and avoid cops, mobsters, pimps and other miscellaneous thugs. It’s pretty interesting, and although it lacks the sheer excitement of the really good genre pics, it does boast one ridiculously creepy sequence, some neat action and effects and interesting scenarios.

See No Evil – Alright slasher flick has a few really good deaths, but isn’t nearly as gory as I expected. It’s alright for fans of the genre though.

Snakes on a Plane – Not good, but a nice late night weekend flick.

Summer School – A silly 80’s comedy about a gym teacher and a rag tag bunch of students. It’s harmless.

Sweeney Todd – Tim Burton’s horror musical pays so seemingly little attention to the music, that it feels like it would have been better without. Depp is just fine and Bonham Carter is lacking, although the rest of the cast (especially Sacha Baron Cohen) are really good. But like most Burton films, it’s technically marvelous at the expense of a solid story. It’s also disarmingly gruesome, an aspect that isn’t particularly obvious from the previews.

To Live and Die in LA – The cops are nearly as bad as the criminals in William Friedkin’s crime caper. A pair of Secret Service agents are on the tail of a counterfeiter, and the film is still enchanting and exciting, even on repeat viewings. It’s got style to burn, and characters that can draw you in, even if you don’t want to be drawn.

Transformers – Entertaining, but nonsensical action for the whole family. I personally don’t like it very much, but I think I’m in the minority. It’s okay, but forgettable.

Death and French Everywhere

Across the Universe – I loved this film, although not as much as I really wanted to. The story of two lovers during the turbulent times of the Vietnam War, it really helps if you are into the Beatles, as the film is a musical that uses nothing but Beatles music. There was no better choice for director than Julie Taymor, given her pedigree, and she works wonders. The films is a bit emotional, but musically and visually it’s a feast of the highest order. It may not always work, especially the acid trip in the middle that utilizes two of my favorite Beatles tunes. Luckily, though, those two pieces are so artistically fascinating that it’s hard to hold it against them. The plotting and run time also needed some tightening up, but that’s okay. Someone on Ebert’s blog wrote that it’s a movie you can fall in love with, imperfections and all. They’ve hit the nail on the head. I adored every moment of the film on some level, so even though I would rate it at about the 90%, I’d recommend it more than some films I’d dole out a 100% to. I laughed, got sad, rocked out, and thoroughly fell for the film’s charms, and it has a lot of them. I’m seriously considering seeing it again tomorrow.

Across the Universe – So I didn’t end up seeing it the next day, although I did see it exactly one week later with my parents. It’s just as good, if not better. The bad choices are more obvious, but so is the glee. It has its faults, to be sure, but even the bad moments are so beautiful and elegant that it is hard to hold it against the film. It’s not perfect, but it’s lively, lovely and thoroughly fun.

Alien 3 – One of the lesser Alien entries had a lot to live up to, following the excellent Alien and the amazing Aliens, so its no surprise that it’s considered an also-ran. Future top-notch director David Fincher has his trademark gloom in spades, and there are a few nice moments. But the CGI aliens look pretty terrible nowadays, and there’s little here to recommend it over any other Alien film. It’s about as base a film as it can get, being both a Fincher film and one from the Alien franchise, but its not without a merit or two.

Alien: Resurrection – The fourth film in the franchise is a good improvement on the last, mainly because of a relentlessly inventive screenplay by Joss Whedon. The director this time is the fabulous Jean-Pierre Jeunet, and he handles the duties capably. The effects are good, the cast (especially a leering Sigourney Weaver) is fun, and although it lacks scares, per se, it has plenty of action. But the real star is the screenplay, after all, and it’s clear that Whedon spent some time with the earlier installments, asking lots of what-ifs and answering them in fascinating ways. A lot of it is not really believable (even in the Alien universe), but at least it’s exciting.

Apocalypto – Mel Gibson’s follow-up to The Passion of the Christ follows a Mayan village that is ransacked by another group of Mayans and their struggle to survive. Had a friend not spoke of its greatness, I probably wouldn’t have bothered, but I’m glad I did. It’s violent and bloody as can be, but it’s also equally engaging. It’s an almost non-stop thrill ride of action and scares, with a keen sense of admiration for its subject, andf its easily recommendable.

Badlands – This semi-classic film from Terrence Malick was clearly inpsired by Bonnie and Clyde, although it even more clearly seemed to have affected Quentin Tarantino, in a story that has parallels with the QT written Natural Born Killers and True Romance, the latter of which, I believe, basically used Badlands’ score. But unlike those other films, it has a poetic sweetness in it’s tale of two young lovers (Martin Sheen and Sissy Spacek) who fall in love and turn to murder. Spacek is totally believable as a the innocent and naïve Holly, while Sheen has a deliberate James Dean-esque coolness. It’s well-rounded and smart, even if it usually feels like it’s rambling with nowhere to go, much like the characters themselves.

Bob le Flambeur – A film that supposedly help kick off the French new-wave, the film is part heist flick, part character study and partly an indictment of the Montemarte lowlives. Bob is a gambler who has a run of bad luck when he recruits a large team of men to rob an “impenetrable” casino vault for the $800 Million payday. It lacks the finesse of most heist films, specifically the Ocean’s 11 vehicles, but it mostly makes up for it with more honest emotion and understated style. It’s cool in its own original way.

Brazil – Extremely dark comic fantasy finds Terry Gilliam in top form. When a governmental error ends in the death of the wrong man, conscionable Sam Lowry tries to fix the situation, only to fall in love with a wanted woman, and end up tormented by the government he works for. Beautifully dystopian images and a gaggle of Gilliam’s characteristic visuals make for a stunning film, and it’s a great cult film if there ever was one.

Buffy the Vampire Slayer – The movie that sorta started it all, before being relegated to oblivion. Kristy Swanson is Buffy, the LA cheerleader, who finds its her destiny to hunt and kill the local vampire population. It’s funny enough for a forgettable B-movie, although it’s (apparently) such a strong variation from the current Buffy canon, that’s there little point in even seeing it. Nevertheless, it’s semi-successful on its own.

Casino Royale – Gritty and sleek, this is not your father’s James Bond. Newcomer Daniel Craig is the rough and ready Bond in this prequel to the rest of the films, as a man who’s not quite as hard yet as he should be. The action pieces are exciting, the writing is crisp, and the story is usually very exciting. The Bond films have needed a make-over for some time, and it looks like we’re finally on the right track.

Death Proof – The latter and better part of the Grindhouse double feature is less glorious on the small screen, although that may also be because it’s simply less exciting the second time around. It’s still plenty good though. The story is overtly simple: The charming Stuntman Mike (Kurt Russell) basically uses a “death proof” car to kill girls in horrendous ways, leaving him virtually unscathed and them mutilated. The shocking middle and electrifying end are pretty awesome, but the dialog is not quite up to snuff for director Quentin Tarantino, and some of the actions aren’t actually believable. Both are issues I missed on the first go round, though, so newbies should enjoy it plenty.

Eastern Promises – David Cronenberg reteams with Viggo Mortensen following the exceptional A History of Violence with a more subdued and straightforward, but still elegant mobster flick. Naomi Watts is a midwife who turns to the mob when trying to decipher the diary of a recently deceased mother. And considering how violent and vile the family is, it starts to really look like bad idea. A ghastly fight sequence aside, the film isn’t really suprising, and the ending isn’t particularly satisfying, but it’s calm, cool and collected all the way through. But as a film, it’s really less than the sum of its parts, which is kind of a shame.

Flash Gordon – A perfect movie for a weekend morning, Flash Gordon is extreme schmaltz. It’s ridiculously cheesy, but its also fun and good natured. They could have used a better star than the lackluster Sam Jones, but even he feels right at home amid the interesting effects, rockin’ score (by Queen) and not-well-thought-out screenplay. Like any early 80’s sci-fi B-movie, it wears its charms on its sleeve, so even if its not great, it’s hard to hold anything against it.

Friday the 13thThe Catalyst: It started something it couldn’t have realized, but is pretty much bare bones for the series. It’s the Dr. No of the Friday series.
Friday the 13th Part 2: The Scary One: It maybe that pillowcase mask, or the shrine, or the general spookiness and craziness. Whatever it is, I find this one to be the scariest.
Friday the 13th Part 3: The Gimmicky One: The worst made of the series, it constantly rips off its predecessors. It also introduced the hockey mask, and was in 3-D, the latter of which makes it awkward, the former of which, when combined with it’s basic-ness, means it inspired the future sequels as much or more than the previous films.
Friday the 13th Part 4 – The Final Chapter: The Big Bang: Jason supposedly went out with a bang in a film with two famous actors (Corey Feldman, Crispin Glover), loads of nudity and great gore courtesy of Tom Savini.
Friday the 13th Part 5: A New Beginning: The Black Sheep: Jason takes a holiday, leaving the mayhem to Roy the ambulance driver. Groan.
Friday the 13th Part 6: Jason Lives: The Funny One: Jason comes back, with humor, clever kills, and a new standard.
Friday the 13th Part 7: The New Blood: The Fun One: Jason battles a girl with telekinesis. Cool.
Friday the 13th Part 8: Jason Takes Manhattan: The Silly One: It’s occasionally funny, but at the expense of a plot with more holes than a hockey mask.
Jason Goes to Hell: The Final Friday: The Wrong One: Weirdly dark. It’s got a great beginning, but the ending is so wrong it’s the most skippable in the series.
Jason X: The Awesome One: Jason ends up on a spaceship in the future, which gives him lots of opportunities for creative deaths and humor.
Freddy vs. Jason: The Ridiculous One: The two Mega-slashers face off under convoluted pretenses. A major Friday plot hole doesn’t help either, but as a whole it’s kinda cool.

Hot Fuzz – This meta-parody of action films has some good laughs, and a lot of chuckles, but its not quite as good as I would want it to be. This is probably an effect of the dry-ish British humor, expecially when just about every movie in their arsenal is purely American. Nevertheless, it does work on most levels, and is pretty satisfying all around.

Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome – Now, this is just silly. The third entry in the Mad Max trilogy trades in the grit and action that made the second installment so successful for something more akin to Peter Pan than a post-apocalyptic thriller. Okay, there is a major car chase. And there’s a memorable fight inside Thunderdome. But both are still a little silly. Then again, they are by far less kid-friendly than the rest of this feel good cartoony post-apocalyptic thrill ride. This is a lot closer to the George Miller that directed Babe than the one who brought us the first two films.

The Nightmare Before Christmas (Digital 3-D version) – More than thirty minutes of 3-D doesn’t really work for me, as it makes me uncomfortable and gives me a minor headache. It’s unfortunate too because this film looks glorious that way. The story isn’t all that great, and neither are the staccato songs by Danny Elfman (although I still love him and own two copies of the soundtrack), but visually it’s truly wonderous. It’s actually a shame that the film is in a limited release, though, given how awesome it looks this way.

Persona – Practically a horror film, Ingmar Bergman’s Persona is about two women: One, an actress who hasn’t spoken since an on-stage breakdown, and the other the nurse who is charged with her care. Spending a summer at a cabin, the two women become closer, eventually blossoming into the same person. Or not. It’s not actually a horror film, but it’s filmed like one, especially one that David Lynch might make. Weird visuals combine with a perfectly awkward screenplay, leading to a memorable and engaging film, although it’s probably too slow for the casual movie-goer.

Pierrot le Fou - Jean-Luc Godard’s crime caper is pretty much exactly what people who don’t want to watch foreign films don’t want to watch. It’s entertaining enough, but its overt artistic flourishes make it more confusing than it need be. It’s actually a relatively simple story of two lovers on a crime wave, and even though I wasn’t confused watching it, I missed some key points due to the film-making. Lovers of foreign cinema are likely to find a lot to like here, though, as there are some parts that are positively beautiful and elegant. But alas, it’s less than the sum of its parts, and is probably better seen on the small screen where you can pause it and think about what you’re seeing.

Rounders – It’s unfortunate that this poker film came out when it did, about two years ahead of the poker boom. Or maybe not, as not only does it get to avoid the “cashing in” stigma, but it’s probably partially responsible for that boom. Edward Norton and Matt Damon are poker players dealing with their own limitations, some bad guys they owe money to, and a game that can be terribly unforgiving. Not only is it a really good film in its own right, but it’s a cetifiable poker manual for wannabe players. If you have an interest in poker, and haven’t seen this, you’ll probably suck.

The Rules of the Game – Long considered one of the best foreign films ever made (some would say best films ever made), Jean Renoir’s tale of upper class shenanigans is dry, but nice. It probably takes repeated viewings to really get into it, but on a first impression basis, it’s entertaining if not particularly engaging. The characters are easily indentifiable, the script is witty and realistic, and there’s a particularly enjoyable “chase” scene near the end, but it’s not the kind of film I would particularly watch if I didn’t feel the need to be more enlightened.

Salem’s Lot – Director Tobe Hooper gets all the credit for the spookiness inherent in this 1979 television adaptation of the Steven King novel. The fact that it was made for TV gets all the blame. It’s got some good scares (even the over-used window scenario is still elegantly creepy) but it’s pacing and slow moments are groan inducing. The ending is also pretty lame stuff, but given the TV movie status, it could have, and should have, been worse.

Saw 3 – The Saw series is turning into the Friday the 13th series of the naughts. Examples: gruesome deaths abound as countless people are slaughtered. The scripts are not terribly imaginative and practically write themselves. The sequels keep coming despite the logistics that declare otherwise (there shouldn’t really be a Saw IV, just like there should not have been a Friday the 13th Part 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, etc… logically speaking. Both appeal to the same class of movie goer. And both are just money-grubbing continuances of what started out as a simple slasher excercises. What’s this mean? Just that I shouldn’t be ashamed of my “admiration” for the former series. Contrarily, I can’t really support Saw fanatics, especially given that watching them does not have the same ironic detachment that comes the F13 series. It’s torture porn, plain and simple, which, while I understand watching that genre, shoudn’t be this popular, or the kind of films that a sane person would look forward to. As to this specific excersise, it’s okay, albeit less clever, less believable, and not particularly frightening. Saw series, meet Friday the 13th Part 3. You’re right on time.

How I Spent My Summer Vacation

The Beastmaster – Low budget and schlocky post apocalyptic adventure about a warrior who can communicate with animals. It’s got imagination, and it is memorable enough if you’re a kid, which is really where the target audience seems to lie. It would have helped if the film had had a better lead, or a bigger budget, but it works in its own little way nevertheless.

Beerfest – It’s an immature and stupid but still occassionally funny movie from the guys who did the hilarious Super Troopers. Beerfest follows five losers who enter an underground drinking competiton in Germany. It suffers from the same ailments that bother all Broken Lizard (as the guys call themselves) movies, in that it often mistakes a funny idea for actual comedy. The laughs are still there from time to time, and sometimes can be really funny, but too often the film doesn’t even seem to be trying.

Beetlejuice – Tim Burton’s classic 80’s fantasy finds a married couple dealing with their newly dead experience by battling the new owners of their house. The story may be a little lacking, but there’s plenty of great humorous moments. On the other hand, the production design and special effects are pretty amazing and nightmarish. It’s a triumph of style over substance, but there is at least some substance, and the style is fascinating.

The Benchwarmers – Rob Schneider, David Spade and John Heder star in another forgettable Billy Madison (the production company) picture. The film has some heart, and some non-guilty humor, but most of the main characters are completely unbelievable and annoying. There is no joke too lame for the script, and there are far too many annoying stupid side characters, making it a film where the side characters almost have more focus than the main characters. There is a slight possibility that a semi-decent movie could have come out of this concept, were everybody involved replaced by more capable people.

Children of the Corn – This is easily one of the movies that scared me most as a kid. Then again, it helps if 1) You are a kid 2) You are not concerned with logic and believability 3) You are watching this at the house of relatives who you aren’t that close to and 4) Those relatives happen to live in the middle of a gigantic corn field. Watching it as an adult in my suburban apartment, it’s pretty stupid, but it does have one valuable lesson: If you are making a movie about scary kids, the kid actors have to be believeable. Anything less, and it’s (forgive me for this) corny.

The Dog Who Stopped the War – An overly memorable film from childhood, this Canadian film follows the children from a small town as they spend their Christmas vacation in a snowball war. It’s mostly slight, but as I said, very memorable, even strangely so, thanks to some funny characters, easily understood situations, and impressive set pieces. But it’s not quite entertaining enough for adults unless you’ve seen it as a kid.

Evan Almighty – It could and should have been funnier. They got a good cast for this Jim Carrey-less sequel, but there just aren’t enough jokes, or things to do in this more-or-less waste of film. I laughed, to be sure, but given Steve Carrell and a supporting cast of known funny people – it shouldn’t feel as if director Bob Oedenkirk is trying to pad out scenes with jokes that hardly work the first time, if it’s a joke at all. It’s also suprisingly obvious with all of its “suprises” leading to a movie that’s perfectly fine if you want to have something on while doing something else, without actually being worth watching.

Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer – AKA: Bored on a Friday Night While Driving By the Budget Theater – Actually, it’s not so bad, at least not as bad as its preceding turkey of a film. The film benefits from an actually somewhat engaging story (for a second rate comic movie franchise), and a good bit of fun in the sequences where the heroes try and fit into normal society. It’s not quality exactly, but at least it feels like director Tim Story was having a little bit of fun with it. Jessica Alba doesn’t hurt either.

The Gauntlet – Straightforward Clint Eastwood actioner finds him as a drunken loser of a cop who is tasked with delivering a hooker to a hearing. But not only does it appear that the mob wants this girl dead, but so does a large section of the police force. It jumps from one decent set piece to another with relative ease, and although it does this too much for too long, it still works out for the most part. It’s not really worth seeking out, but its certainly worth watching if its on.

Gimme Shelter – A 1970 rockumentary following the Rolling Stones on tour, and focusing on Altamont, there is a lot of inherent interest in the story. It’s an engaging film, although that’s not really a tribute to the film-makers. In fact, as a documentary, it’s a little slow, occasionally confusing, and probably too impressed with itself to really be successful. But the fact behind the story is still compelling, and its amazing that nobody though that combining 20,000 people, lots of drugs, a 24-hour wait, and security by the Hell’s Angels was a recipe for disaster.

Hostage – I remembered from when I saw this in theaters that I really liked it, but sitting down to watch it, I realized I remembered very little about the plot. That’s about as apt a description as I’ve got. This Bruce Willis thriller is a perfectly capable film, and it has plenty of moments that are enjoyable if not entirely memorable. It’s not going to go down in history, or even be remembered tomorrow, but it’ll do for an evening of tense fun.

The Ice Harvest – John Cusack is a mob attorney who embezzles $2 Million from his boss with the help of Billy Bob Thorton is this dark comedy thriller. Unfortunately, the film isn’t actually funny nor is it well-written. It’s entertaining-ish, and it works as a slight thriller, but it doesn't add up to as much as it could have.

The Iron Giant – I’ve heard from multiple sources that this 1999 animated film was top-notch, but it’s taken me until now to actually see it. Is it as good as they say? Probably not, but I can see why they like it. It’s suprisingly honest and straight-forward. It actually seems like an adult movie in kids form, mixing parts of ET with The Day the Earth Stood Still. It’s a commendable exercise, and parts of it are sublime, but a bit too much of it seems, well, childish. In any rate, it’s a perfectly commendable way to spend a Saturday morning.

Lucky Number Slevin – A criminal caper akin to Smokin’ Aces, Lucky Number Slevin concerns a guy named Slevin (Josh hartnett) who, in a case of mistaken identity is stuck in the middle of two warring New York gangs. It’s a lot more realistic than Aces, but also slightly less fun ( at least until the two-thirds mark, when it becomes a lot less fun and more serious), although Hartnett’s Slevin character is a kick to watch. It’s probably better than Aces, too, but the truth is if you like one of them, you’ll probably like the other. It’s terribly uneven, but it’s also entertaining and slick, without being overly so on either account. *In retrospect, scenes and concepts from the film have been going through my head fairly regularly, and I’m actually finding it to be quite exciting. I might really like this movie.

Mad Max – Mel Gibson is a cop in the post-apocalyptic Aussie future who butts heads with a gang of bizarre and ruthless bikers. It’s not as action-packed as I expected, mainly because of how eclipsed it has been by the tough-as-nails sequel The Road Warrior. But you can see where the Road Warrior material comes from, because when the film gets down and dirty, there’s plenty of action and excitement. But it spends a lot of time on silly, unnecessary things like plot and story.

Man on Fire – Denzel Washington is a bodyguard in Mexico City who becomes attached to the little girl he’s protecting (Dakota Fanning). When she is killed in a botched kidnapping, and he is shot several times, he goes after everyone responsible in sadistic ways. It’s about as “torture-porn” as a main stream action film would dare get, and in that way it’s tremendously successful. But it’s not for the faint of heart, the easily manipulated or the easily confused. It’s long and complex, but fascinatingly so.

The NeverEnding Story – The same Sunday morning I reverted to my childhood with The Dog Who Stopped the War, I also watched this other classic, and one that’s much more familiar to American audiences. Wolfgang Petersen’s childlike fantasy is also rich with memorable characters and fascinating situations, leading to a movie that’s uncommonly emotional and literally fantastic. It’s an almost seamless production, which is amazing given that its 22 years old now (or so).

The Outlaw Josey Wales – Clint Eastwood’s 1976 western is a little by the book, in that it sets up a series of cliched scenarios and then guns them down one by one in true Eastwood fashion. That’s not a bad thing, especially when it’s as enjoyable a western as it is and has a good heart, albeit a good heart that’s buried under piles of blood and guns. That good heart also practically makes it an excellent prequel to Unforgiven, which is nothing short of praiseworthy.

Shoot’em Up – Even more so that Live Free or Die Hard, Shoot’em Up is that absolutely impossible action film that left me grinning beginning to end. Living up to its name, the film rarely stops letting the bullets fly long enough to squeak in a story, and that’s a good thing. No story would ever make the rest of it more coherent, or in fact, better. No, this movie exists on its own plane, and has so many fantabulous moments, I get giddy thinking about it. It may not be art (or even actually good), but it kicks some serious ass, repeatedly, and it absolutely rocks my world.

The Simpsons Movie – It’s basically a 90 minute Simpsons episode, with all that entails. One thing leads to another, which leads to another, and so on, until Homer is eventually forced to save all of Springfield. There’s are a lot of hilarious moments, and a lot of slyly funny moments, leading to a movie that’s not likely to win over any new fans, but should satisfy the old.

Superbad – Yeah, it’s raunchy (with almost no nudity), but yes, it’s also very funny. Michael Cera and Jonah Hill are easily familiar with anybody who didn’t quite fit in high school, and have the comedy chops to pull off the leads well enough, even as they’re ebeing upstaged by cops Bill Hader and Seth Rogen, and uber geek McLovin.’ There may or may not be quotes from this entered into the popular lexicon (although McLovin’ has some staying power), but its more than funny enough to be remember for a generation. And, as with most films involving Judd Apatow, it’s got a sense of real truth to it to boot.

The Taking of Pelham One Two Three – Walter Matthau is a transit cop who tackles a group of terrorists (including Robert Shaw, Martin Balsam and Hector Elizondo) who have hijacked a New York City subway car. There’s great gobs of humor throughout the story, and they compliment the tension and action wonderfully. It’s a fun, entertaining kitsch ride.

Twins – Arnold Schwarzeneggar and Danny DeVito are recently reunited twins who try to reconnect with their mother and evade some baddies on the way to a $5 Million payday. The film is stylish and charming, but not actually very funny. Director Ivan Reitman allows almost all of the humor to spring from the concept of twins as different as these two, and familiar situations in the fish-out-of-water vein, rather than anything fresh.

The Warriors – I’ve wanted to see this film (on some level) for a long time, and I was not dissappointed. The tale of a New York Gang who have to make it all the way across the city while every other gang is trying to take them down, The Warriors is almost always tense and never lacking for something to do. It’s not quite all there: The fights lack oomph, and the story starts to drag on occasion. But when director Walter Hill sets his sights on tension, the results are fairly impressive.

When Harry Met Sally – Rob Reiner’s romantic comedy is both riotously funny and acceptably true-to-life. Billy Crystal is the semi-slimy Harry and Meg Ryan is the uptight Sally, and they’ve rarely (if ever) been better. As if that weren’t enough, there’s the great support of Carrie Fisher and Bruno Kirby, and a screenplay that is consistently hilarious and engaging. There are a few romantic comedies as good as this one, but not many.

The Wild Bunch – This classic, violent western concerns a troup of outlaws (including William Holden and Ernest Borgnine) as they try to outlast and outshoot a posse intent on bringing them in. There are plenty of nice set pieces, and the film is certainly well-made and entertaining, even if it’s not all too memorbale, especially now that the violence content has been diminshed in modern times.

Young Sherlock Holmes – Produced by Steven Spielberg and directed by Barry Levinson, Young imagines what it would have been like had Holmes met Watson in their high school days. The production is top notch, leading to a splendid time, even if its not entirely successful. The film simply has no clear audience, as it is reliably cerebral throughout most of its run time, and then semi-swashbuckly near the end. It’s charming without being funny, and its interesting without being engaging. But it looks really nice, and is certainly not worth avoiding.

Zodiac – It takes David Fincher years to make a new movie, so when he finally does, it’s a pretty good bet that it’s at least pretty good. Zodiac is no exception, though it’s not quite as impressive as his previous work. That’s probably because the true story of the Zodiac killer requires a certain amount of respect for those involved, but also because there’s enough actual fear and distress in the story as is, without overt flourishes. Either way, the film is successful in being both maddening and disturbing. Having just seen it, I can’t even imagine leaving my apartment right now.

18 Movies in 2 Months...

And I started the year with one a day. I'm losing my touch, I guess.

Altered States – William Hurt (in his first major role) plays a scientist whose expirements not only have far-reaching effects for the world but may kill him in the process. I could spell out more of it for you, but most of the experience of the movie for me was being taken by surprise. Truth is, that’s pretty much all I got out of this absolutely bizarre sci-fi-ish movie. There’s a few pretty chilling scenes, but the big pay-offs are particularly silly. Even more amusing, the silliness is at odds with the rest of the screenplay, which is almost confusingly scientific and stuffy. I didn’t like the movie, and don’t consider it to be good, but it’s at least interesting. Also of interest, I bet if someone were to watch this under the influence of narcotics, their head would explode.

Black X-mas – Glen Morgan and James Wong were the two writers I could always count on for great X-Files episodes. Why is it, then, that their ventures on the big screen (the okay The One, the decent at best Final Destinations 1 and 3 and the entertaining but forgettable Willard) left so much to be desired. Well, say what you will about those films. Morgan’s remake of Black Christmas makes them seem like Oscar-bait in comparison. If the beginning of the film wasn’t confusing, it’s be ridiculously obvious. Not that it really matters: there really isn’t a plot to speak of, even by slasher movie standards. It’s one good point, if it has one, is the fact that none of the characters are sure to make it, given that four of them are actually kind of famous. But even that’s not actually true, if I were to think about it. But why would I? Black X-mas is a ridculous, convoluted, unconvincing and hackneyed film. Just don’t even bother.

Die Hard – It was a Thursday night, and I was feeling pretty blah. No movie that I had from the library, or any in my collection that I hadn’t gotten around to yet, was very tempting. That’s when I decided to watch Die Hard. One of my favorite action movies (if not my favorite), it does have it’s share of subpar characters and silly moments. Specifically, Dwayne T. Robinson, while funny, isn’t believable, and I don’t buy the Argyle situation, nor the dead-guy-comes-back finale. But when it’s not subpar in those instances, it’s so ridiculously good, it hurts. Bruce Willis hit all the right notes, and mostly realistically. But the main star, the action, is so bloody good, exciting and entertaining, it’s impossible not to get adrenalized. Die Hard might be the perfect cure for the Thursday blahs.

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix – The fifth Harry Potter film moves along at a brisk pace, so even at more than two hours, it hardly seems like one, really. A few of the scenes stand out as wonderful, magical and thrilling, too. Of course, there are also those that feel by the numbers, which in a Harry Potter film is only to be expected. In the end, it’s a fine entry into the series, but I wholeheartedly recommend seeing it in an IMAX if you can, as the final scenes are all in 3-D. It can be a bit distracting and hard to understand this way, but it’s also totally awesome.

High Noon – A classic western about a marshall who finds himself alone when standing up to a group of vengeful outlaws, High Noon is slow, deliberate and quite intelligent. The performances are all believeable, as is the relaxed screenplay, which takes it’s time but ratchets up the tension slowly with each minute. It’s a must-see for any film fan, but western fans in particular.

Idiocracy – Mike Judge’s follow-up to Office Space was strangely and famously not even shown in theaters, but rather quietly shuffled into video stores after several years. It’s mostly a shame, but not entirely, though, because even though it’s riotously funny at times (I laughed loudly more times than at any movie in quite a while), it still feels only partly done. The scant run time doesn’t help, nor does the fact that it ends at what I assumed was a middle. But it also feels kind of thrown together, without any real focus or, dare I say it, editing. Whether that’s the cause of it not going to theaters, or an effect of it, I could not say. But it feels as if Judge just kind of gave up on the film before completion.

Live Free or Die Hard – Hell, yeah! Probaby my most highly anticipated film of the summer, Live Free totally rocked my world. Yes, it’s got stunts so unbelievavle, I don’t think they could have been done if John McLane and the terrorists had choreographed it in advance. Yes, it has a large amount of throw-away characters and bad jokes, which keep it in tune with the franchise. And yes, it’s nothing more than popcorn fodder. But this is my kind of popcorn fodder through and through. It’s exciting and dsturbing (in the intended ways), but watching it made me positively giddy. My biggest original issue, I don’t think the PG-13 rating helped, but it was only noticable once. And I was so overjoyed when it happened I barely noticed. It’s the best time I’ve had at a movie in a long time.

The Night of the Hunter – When I first saw this years ago, it left a memorably umpleasant taste in my mouth. I don’t remember exactly why I didn’t like it, but I distinctly remember not liking it. That’s why I decided to give this classic another chance. I’m glad I did. Not because I liked it, but because I disliked it even more than I remember. It’s got some interesting performances, some good scary moments and generally good cinematography. But to counteract it, it’s also got a script that gets incredibly amateur at times, and direction that’s amazingly uneven. The occasional actor roots the performance in reality, whereas more often than not, a performance is ridculously over the top. Case in point: Robert Mitchum doing a Wile E. Coyote impression right after getting shot at. Occasionally, he’s terrifying. But in a single moment, it’s as if first (and only) time director Charles Laughton decided to make him funny. It sticks out like a sore thumb. And that type of thing (though rarely as glaring) runs throughout the whole movie, punching holes in what would otherwise be truly terrifying. I really don’t know why it’s viewed nearly as well as it is.

Ocean's 13 - Soderberg's Ocean's 11 was a truly good movie, full of fun, excitement and a tangible sense of cool. Ocean's 12 was okay, but was too engrossed in having its own fun that it forgot to include the audience. Soderberg was clearly trying to make up for that with Ocean's 13, and succeeds, mostly. It feels more awkward than either of the previous two installments, but there are a handful of brilliant and funny moments. Most importantly, though, they made up for Ocean's 12 by bringing us back into the loop. I can't really describe it - I mean, I liked Ocean's 12 okay - and I am unable to really determine what it is about 13 that I don't quite stand behind whole-heartedly, or what about 12 leaves an increasingly tart taste in my mouth. Let's just say that Ocean's 13 is fun, and good, and better. But it's not quite all the way there.

Outland – This is probably the first film I ever saw solely on the basis of reading it’s Mag Magazine parody. A 1981 scif-fi film from director Peter Hyams, the film suffers mostly from being a 1981 sci-fi film. That means that the effects, which the film really loves (from not-very-good director Peter Hyams), feel silly and/or stupid. And although its not a bad movie, per se, it just kind of limps across the screen.

Paris, Je T’aime – I must confess that I love the French. The beauty of the language probably has a lot to do with it, as does the storybook qualities that are ficticiously attributed to it. My crush on Audrey Tautou doesn’t help either. At any rate, I was predisposed to liking Paris, an anthology of 18 films from18 directors, all telling a love story in the City of Lights. And I did like it. A lot. Although not every story is great, many are, those that aren’t still have an edge of sweetness and emotion, and the whole film is wonderful in essence. It is a cinematic box of chocolates if there ever was one: Whereas some stuff is exactly what you love, the rest may not be up your alley, but they still have that chocolate-y goodness. This is a pretty excellent date movie, and I highly recommend it to just about everyone.

Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest – It may not add up to much in the end, but there is a distinct giddiness about this film, rampant in every aspect. Personally, I adored the swashbuckling pirate adventures it loaded to the brim, found every single performance to be successful on some level, and mostly, found the spectacle of the whole film to be, as intended, spectacular. It’s nowhere near my favorite film of last year, but as a Saturday matinee/action extravaganza/family adventure, it’s hard to find much better.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0449088/ – On a technical level, there’s not a darn thing wrong the third installment of the Pirates franchise. The sets are impressive and the CGI shows a complete mastery of the art. The performances are reliable, though not exactly shining. But the screenplay is where the film fails, and not in the expected way. The problem is that screenwriters Ted Elliott and Terry Rossio get too obsessed with their own mythology. Halfway through the film, I realized that the whole story, every convoluted and complicated detail as well as every meaningless character-driven subplot with nowhere to go, is based on the over-inflated self-importance that Elliott, Rossio and director Gore Verbinski bring to the proceedings. I hate to say it, but nobody has probably ever gone to a Pirates movie because of the characters of Will and Elizabeth (although they may go to gawk at Orlando and Keira). People go to see Jack Sparrow slur words and swashbuckle with monsters. For the most part, they don’t care about Barbarosa, or Calypso, or the East Indian Trading Company. I’m not saying the film shouldn’t have a plot, but there is no reason for this much plot, a muddled saga of the ancient pirating world. The screenplay feels like it’s patting itself on the back for being clever, and layered with stories and motives. Somehow, it even lacks a lot of excitement, trading in most of the big moments for silliness, conventional unconventionality and inside jokes. It’s clear that the movie is more interested in entertaining itself than it is in entertaining an audience. My guess is Johnny Depp had a heck of a time. Me? Not so much.

Smokin’ Aces - If there’s one major problem with Smokin’ Aces, last year’s action-fest about several groups of hitmen all out to kill one informant, it’s that when everything is as over the top as it can get, nothing is actually all that suprising. The film thrives on adrenaline-fueled, quirky character driven action with a borderline cartoon-ish feel. It’s over-the-top and exciting, and even a little bit funny. But when a movie throws everything it can think of at you, it’s hard to really care about the characters, or worry about the situation. Just about anything can happen (although there is one genuine surprise, early), and as such, it doesn’t actually matter to us from a story standpoint. We are just along for the ride.
There’s also the more slow, serious moments, which although rare, fall flat on their face. They don’t ruin the movie so much as take away from the full-fledged extravaganza that surrounds the rest of the movie. It may seem particularly odd, given the anything-goes problem, but think of it this way. If a Looney Tunes segment were to end on a soliloquy about existentialism, that wouldn’t make it any less silly, or any more realistic. It’d really just feel awkward.

Sorority Girls at the Slimeball Bowl-O-Rama – Uh, it was free and I was bored. And once you’ve heard of it, you’re not likely to forget it exists (even if that doesn’t translate to wanting to see it). That said, yes it’s incredibly stupid, and unfortunately, not to its benefit. There’s the so-stupid-its-funny movie, then there’s the trying-too-hard-to-be stupid category, which is a rarity, but definitelt exists. In other words, the creators tried to make a stupid movie, and succeeded. But who really needs a movie that wants to suck?

Splash – Tom Hanks and Ron Howard teamed up for this 1980’s crowd-pleaser, and it still works today. In fact, given as I hadn’t seen this since I was a kid, it had a bit more than I expected, given the things that I didn’t notice or wouldn’t have understood then. On the other hand, it also suffers from comedy ridiculousness, as a few plot details are completely unconvincing and unrealistic, things I totally would have fallen for as a youth. But if you can get past that (and most people can – I mean, it’s a movie about a mermaid) it still remains a pleasant diversion.

Transformers – Most reviews said that Transformers was actually a good movie. The effects were good, but distracting. And suprisingly enough, it was the emotional, human elements in this Michael Bay flick that were actually the charming heart of the movie (a factor that is probably attributable to producer Steven Spielberg). So, I dragged myself to my “other” college theater and watched it. And I wasn’t impressed. It did look good, but was expectedly distracting. And although there was charm, I couldn’t help but get the feeling that everytime the human element, and the charm, took center stage, Michael Bay was making fun of us. I don’t think Bay cares about human elements (which is one reason Pearl Harbor sucked, after all) and seeing him try it to pleasure Spielberg felt awkward to me. I just didn’t buy it.

Videodrome - David Cronenberg's 80's horror film probably has a lot of strong messages about sex, violence and the media, but it's hard to really see through the ludicrous stupidity of the whole project. I not only found it a tad difficult to follow through all of it's hallucinatory plot points, but also unrealistic in a way that made me not really care. The effects are pretty successful in their own right, though, and there are more than a few "curious" moments, but as a whole, the film feels very dated. The movie may just have inadvertently proved that your imagination is much better than the televised versions of someone else's.

Aaaah...Nostalgia

Big - A sweet and charming classic about a thirteen-year-old who finds himself in a 30-year old's body, Big finds Tom Hanks somewhere in between laughable comic actor and man with serious aspirations. The memorable parts of the film (specifically the piano sequence) is still fun to behold, but it's the little quirks and moments that I appreciated most. It's semi-conventional schlock, but it's semi-conventional schlock done right.

The Black Book - Paul Verhoeven returns to Holland and gets away from his sci-fi American debauchery. For those only familiar with his US films (Robocop, Total Recall, Starship Rroopers, Basic Instinct, Showgirls and a few others), Black Book will seem really subdued, but it's likely similar to his pre-US films in its themes and vices. It's the tale of Dutch resistance fighters during the World War II Nazi invasion, and one girl's strong will in the face of the horror around her. It's not short on sex, violence, mystery, villains or fear, so although its not for everyone, chances are that the intended audience will be able to find it. Personally, I was left with several unanswered questions, and wasn't quite as thrilled as I had hoped to be, but it was a peasant viewing experience, made all the more exciting by seeing it on opening night at the first ever Sundance Theater.

Boondock Saints – Two brothers take it upon themselves to eradicate the mob in this creative thriller. The odd choices in making it, which are strangely welcome, take away from the large bursts of violence and mayhem. But the film does suffer from a pretentious sense of cool. It wears its cleverness on its sleeve, and is willing to go way overboard to remain fresh and unexpected. That’s not too much of a negative, as some people are sure to love that in fact, but it makes it hard for me to respect. A movie looking for this much indie cred strikes me as borderline pathetic.

Close Encounters of the Third Kind – Steven Speilberg’s first alien outing is a lot more for adults than kids, and yet it occasionally feels even tamer than ET. It also has a slightly too long run-time, which is only emphasized by the occasional scene where nothing seems to happen. (That may be because I started watching it at 11:00 at night, mind you). But when it shines, and it does regularly, boy does it shine. A large percentage of the scenes are fascinating and glorious, full of excitement, fear and wonder. It’s the kind of movie that isn’t nearly given enough justice when you see it on the small screen.

Eyes Without a Face (Les Yeaux Sans Visage) – This classic 1960 French thriller plays like a horror movie, but is really a drama at heart. The disturbing tale of a cosmetic surgeon who removes the faces from his kidnapped victims and attempts to graft them onto the face of his disfigured daughter does boast a pretty gruesome surgery scene. I also adored the carnival-like theme song from Maurice Jarre. But most of all, I loved the delicacy and emotion behind the film, a movie about regular human being stuck in a nightmarish situation. It’s tender and disturbing in almost equal parts.

Hard Boiled – As a fairly decent fan of the action genre, there is absolutely no excuse for me not having seen this yet. In fact, as I write this, I feel rather embarassed by that fact. A magnum opus from John Woo, Hard Boiled is like The Departed meets Die Hard, as a no-holds-barred cop tries to take down a ruthless gun running mobster, and runs into trouble with one of said mobster’s prized minions, who just happens to be an undercover. This is probably the most violent action film I’ve ever seen, as bullets fly in all directions and sometimes make up new directions to fly in. It’s over the top…WAY over the top… but it also has a few moments of realism, with some totally despicable baddies, plus the requisite cheesy serious moments. Nevertheless, this movie kicks ass, and no self-respecting action fan can stand to miss it.

Highlander – A 500 year old Scotsmen (Christopher Lambert) faces off against an even older brute (Clancy Brown) to be the last remaining immortal on Earth. This 80’s cult classic is more than a little ridculous, and its also a little underwhelming, looking like a low-budget B-movie graced with the presence of Sean Connery. But maybe I’m just bitter. This is the kind of movie that left its imprint on kids of my generation. Had I seen it as a youngster, I would undoubtedly have liked it a lot, but seeing it at 30, I feel like I was ripped off in childhood.

Hot Fuzz – The second film from the director, writers and stars of Shaun of the Dead finds supercop Nicholas Angel transferred out of London for being too good, and ending up in a quaint little town where the biggest crime seems to be public urination. Of course, when a serial killer starts whacking the locals, Angel is the only one who thinks there may be crimes in progress, whereas everyone else thinks that the deaths are simply accidents. The first part of the movie is certifiably awesome and hilarious, with a few wonderful characters and some great little bits. The middle loses its footing a bit, though, with the plot and pacing seeming convoluted and ineffective. The movie ends on an even more uneven keel, switching between brilliantly (and awkwardly) funny moments, and extreme action sequences meant as satire, but falling short of coherence or the charm that the first part had. It’s certainly worth watching, and it is pretty consistently funny, even if its not entirely successful.

Kiss Kiss Bang Bang – Shane Black was one of the champions of the big action films of the late 80’s and early 90’s before he dissappeared into oblivion. Kiss Kiss Bang Bang is his return to film, this time as director, in a meta-mystery that has some of his trademark action and a lot of unexpected laughs. Robert Downey Jr. is great as Harry, a two-bit thief turned should-be movie star, turned private eye in training. Val Kilmer is an actual private eye, the very intelligent Gay Perry, who is training him. And the lowlives of LA are the supporting cast, as killers, victims, masterminds and shady characters. It’s very witty and a lot of fun, and knows exactly what its doing at any given moment.

Slither – Gross and disturbing, but also occassionally genuinely exciting, Slither follows a motley crew of small-towners as they try to survive a bizarre alien plague. Fun performances and a delightful sense of humor help this obvious B-movie be as successful as it could possibly be, and it does work. It’s a whole lot of disgusting fun.

Spider-Man 3 – The latest entry into a really good trilogy is less than the previous efforts, but only because it’s clearly trying too hard. The first third of the movie is almost rapid fire, with a string of scenes that seem unrelated, and really only serve to get the back story done so the rest can get underway. The middle third is even less satisfying, with the darker (yet more comedic) aspects of the Spider-Man character that drive his humanity being made too human. The final third does do wonders though in saving the film, and the finale is ultimately very satisfying. But it’s hard to recommend because the bulk of the film is so flawed, contrived, and time wasting. It would have been better served to split it over a third and fourth movie, which at least would have given the emotional elements (something the first two films thrived on) more time to take hold. As such, it’s only at the very end when emotion even begins to kick in. So in essence, by front-loading the film, director Sam Raimi deprived the audience of the emotion that made the first to really worth watching.

Spider-Man 3 (deux) - On second viewing the film really started to segregate itself for me, so that there were things that I really did like and things I really didn't. On the didn't like front, there was Gwen Stacy (Bryce Dallas Howard). I doubt it would have been much better with a different actress, though I'm not terribly fond of Howard, but I think it's just the character that I find useless. The second viewing also allows more of the emotion to shine through, since I didn't feel quite so bogged down with keeping up with the rapid-fire scenes, but it still lacks the strong emotional resonance of the first two. Finally, I was less than impressed with Maguire, who although not bad, wasn't quite up to snuff as the cocky, malicious black Spidey. But oh, I loved the villains. Thomas Hayden Church is pleasant as Flint Marko, bringing nice sensibilities to a complicated villain. And Topher Grace made me ecstatic as Eddie Brock (less so as Venom, because its hard to act from behind CG), who nails his cocky, malicious characters with flair. And James Franco really shined when he was able to use his darker nature, although it seemed at times that he found his "happier" parts just as corny as I did. My appreciation of the movie rose a little on the second viewing, but it's still just a taste of how good the other two were.

Top Gun – I don’t know whether it was this cliched at the time, or whether my repeat viewings in youth made it feel cliched, but it felt pretty stale to me this time around. Tom Cruise oozes charisma as Maverick, the ace pilot, although I personally didn’t like the character too much. Val Kilmer’s Iceman, on the other hand, was a much more likable character, even though Kilmer’s performance made me think he had way too much starch in his shirts. The stunt work is a wee bit confusing at times, but it does have the most basic of adrenaline rushes to go along with it. The rest of it, and the film as a whole works, but it almost has to given the tried-and-true formula the screenplay traced.

Guess who hasn't been watching movies recently?

Grindhouse – Robert Rodriguez has spent a long time making movies however he wants to. In fact, it’s been many years since he didn’t handle just about every major aspect of his films himself. In such, his films have been hellzapoppin’ experiences, semi-eccentric multi-narrative flicks with a little bit of a focus problem. Allowing him to make anything he wants as a homage to 70’s B-movie flicks is therefore just asking for a film that is totally unfocused, over the top and sporadic. In that way, Rodrigues delivers. His Grindhouse entry, Planet Terror, is an anything-goes zombie flick that does absolutely everything it can think of. It’s entertaining, absolutely entertaining, but it’s messy from a film-making standpoint. As such, it’s great popcorn fun, with lots of butter, and nothing nutritious about it. Then there’s Death Proof, the second film in the double feature from Quentin Tarantino. Hesitant as I was about this one, I actually adore it now. Tarantino not only uses his usually flair for dialog and characters to great effect, but adds several long, brilliantly tense moments the likes of which he’s never done before. This is greasy stuff through and through, but it’s a great film in its own right. Basing the film off of the 70’s shock cinema certainly helped push Tarantino in the right direction, but this movie may have thrived all on it’s own. It’s totally cool, wonderfully handled pulp. If Planet Terror is the popcorn, Death Proof is a lemonade: Cool, refreshing, and better for you. Of course Grindhouse also has three great previews in between the two films, each one better than the last, and culminating in a hilarious, horrific and just plain wrong piece by Hostel director Eli Roth. If we stick with the food motif, these are like stealing some candy from the guy sitting next to you: Great while it lasts, and despite how bad it may be for you, you almost wish you could get the whole thing.

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire – The fourth entry in the Harry Potter series is perfectly respectable. There are some gorgeous images and some effective scares, as well as the usual spate of fun performances. In fact, it is actually a pretty good movie in its own right, making good choices with the source material, even if it doesn’t always do it complete justice.

High Plains Drifter – A wicked western that finds a nameless gunslinger hired by a town to protect it from an impending visit by some no-good bandits with a grudge. It’s occasionally hilarious, and always gritty, leaving a nasty taste in the mouth, but one that is enjoyable because of how unexpected it is. There’s a questionable sub-plot about a rape, plus some not-so-well-though-out back story to mar it, but there’s so much to be in awe of in Clint Eastwood’s second directing gig that it’s hard to let them stand in the way.

Hook – Wow! What a terrible movie! A Slate writer once wrote that Hook was a terrible waste of time and that in Jurassic Park, while looking at the "big pile of sh*t", Jeff Goldblum was supposed to say “Wow, That’s a Hook.” I used to think that was arbitrarily mean. I’d seen the movie in my youth, and vaguely remember being rather fond of it. But alas, I’ve learned to appreciate art, even passable films, and Hook just isn’t it. Robin Williams, Dustin Hoffman and Bob Hoskins (plus a slew of others) totally embarrass themselves. The story is all over the place mentally, being sickly sweet one moment, incredibly slow and boring the next, and eventually turning surrealistically nightmarish. One of the film’s biggest boasts, the set design, is too overbearing, at best serving as eye candy when nothing else works, but at worst, being hugely distracting when something almost does. Spielberg has a tendency to prefer fatherhood motifs, and that was clearly the big draw for him here, but he should have kept looking. The script is terrible and unbelievable, even for a family fantasy.

Leon: The Professional – This sweet, emotional and violent-as-hell thriller from Luc Besson finds a professional hitman (Jean Reno) caring for the little girl (Natalie Portman) who’s family has been murdered. As she tries to learn the tricks of the hitman trade, he loses his grasp of his own world, finding someone to care for and about. It’s slick and relentlessly brutal, but also ridiculously entertaining and a more than a little sad. It’s not for everybody, but if it crosses into your preferred genres, it’s a must-see. It’s a fascinating and great movie.

300 – The people who saw this before all told me the same thing, and when that happens, I not only must assume that its correct, but that its obvious in the movie. 300 is not a good movie: the acting is average and the script is close to non-existent. But it is fascinating to watch, thanks to massively impressive special effects and production. The amount of violence is astounding, and the film is little more than an army of millions taking on an army of 300, with the 300 being more than able to take on the millions. As such, its an endless parade of violence, and although it lasts a wee bit too long, I still wouldn’t hesitate to watch it again.

Go West Young Man

Although there were not a lot of movies watched since I last posted (at least not when compared to my normal habits), I did get to see a lot of classics. Mostly, though, I found a renewed interest in the western, as you will see below.

The Drowning Pool – Paul Newman returns as Lew Harper, only this time he finds himself in Louisiana taking on a blackmail case that quickly turns to murder. It has more of the same stuff that made the first great, only it seems to lack that anything-goes quality and randiness of the sixties that the earlier film revelled in. It’s still worth checking out, although less so than the original Harper.

Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai – Let me start by saying that I did not like the last twenty minutes of this movie. I understand why it was included, and it was necessary, well done and in line with the rest of the story, but I didn’t like it anyway. That said, I enjoyed the first ninety minutes immensely. It was cool, funny, visceral, exciting and totally fascinating. There was no end to the stuff that was likeable, and it was ridculously entertaining to boot. I wholeheartedly recommend it.

Grease 2 – I’ll admit, I’ve seen this movie an untold number of times since I was a kid, and I’ve always loved it. That’s not to say its not terrible, though. It’s stupid and silly, in ridculous amounts. Most of the cast seems just happy to be here, not actually even trying to create characters or act. The music is way too 80’s, considering that the original Grease was all about fifties nostalgia. The production is like that of a high school musical, with some sequences probably being filmed simply because they had sets built already. The big important motorcycle sequence is really lame, as are the other “action” pieces. In fact, watching it now, I’m sure all my love is a combination of nostalgia and pity, but it’s just as well. This is one of my guiltiest pleasures still, and always will be.

Hang ‘Em High – Forget John Wayne, I’ll take Clint Eastwood any day. This 1968 western stars Eastwood as Jed Cooper, the near-victim of a lynch mob for a crime he didn’t commit. He survives, is named a Marshall, and then goes after the men who hanged him unjustly. The film has a lot to say about justice, vigilance, and the death penalty, and it more or less makes its case pretty well. And although it suffers through its share of slow parts and awkward direction, it’s still pretty entertaining.

Harper – While browsing through the local library, I came across The Drowning Pool, a film that I had heard of before. Finding out it was the continuation of Paul Newman’s Harper character, I decided to pass. Then I came across Harper and decided to get them both. It’s probably the first time I checked a movie out of the library having never heard of it previously, and it was mostly worth it. A standard detective story led by a great cast (and a great Paul Newman), the film follows private eye Lew Harper on a missing person’s case. It’s a near-definitive film noir, loaded with humor, violence, thrills and “dames.”

Jaws – Great. But you probably knew that already.

Metropolis – Fritz Lang’s 1927 sci-fi classic has a lot of the same problems that any other of the films from that area also had, including the hammy acting and sometimes really awkward pacing and directorial elements. But even with that, It’s still an absolutely incredible masterpiece. It’s imagery and style are all endlessly fascinating, and its story can be pretty engrossing. The effects in it are wildly impressive, especially for the time, and although I wish that more of the footage had been located (it may have been since this 2002 DVD was released), the restoration is pristine. It’s also got a lot of political allegory that I’m sure I only caught a fraction of, in a story about a dystopian future where the workers bleed themselves dry for the inconsiderate benefit of the well-to-do, but it’s also imaginative enough to satisfy most current sci-fi fans. At the very least, it’s a film that sci-fi fans must see, if for no other reason than it’s obviously heavy impact on the genre.

The Ox-Bow Incident – William Wellman’s classic western finds Henry Fonda and Harry Morgan joining a large group of vengeance seekers taking the law into their own hands to find and hang a group they believe killed a local friend. Although a few of them strongly believe that justice should be handled by the courts, they are no match for the mob mentality of a bunch of angry cowboys. This is a great movie. I wasn’t sure what to expect when I started watching it, but I the end I was saddened, upset and occasionally downright angry. It’s not a true western for a few reasons, as its more akin to 12 Angry Men than The Searchers or Rio Bravo, but it packs a wallop in whatever genre you place it.

Paths of Glory – Stanley Kubrick’s 1957 war film finds Kirk Douglas leading a French batallion in a misguided mission to take a German stronghold. When the mission fails, three ordinary soldiers are held as the scapegoats, and none of the brass will listen to logic or reasoning. Even at a brisk 87 minutes, chunks of it still feel padded out, but that’s because the other sections are pretty strong and harrowing. It’s well worth its classic status, even if I didn’t find it to be that great.

Red River – John Wayne and Montgomery Clift try to take 9,000 heads of cattle across 1,000 miles to be sold in Missouri, in Howard Hawks’ classic western. This is probably the best John Wayne I’ve ever seen, too. The film has it all, from cowboy-indian battles, to a love story, to duels, to stampedes. It’s clearly the basis for City Slickers in many ways, with the latter stealing a few key plot points and the overall plotline. It’s glorious and epic, although it suffers from the same thing that every Montgomery Clift movie suffers from, namely the bland acting skills of Montgomery Clift.

Rio Bravo – Rio Bravo was my first stop on the western binge, and marks only my second John Wayne film ever. I was positively giddy when it started, just at the prospect of another western. And although I was enjoying it all the way through, it did carry on too long. The film follows a sheriff named Chance and his three deputies (Dean Martin, Rick Nelson and Walter Brennan) as they try and ward off some rich local scumbags trying to break one of their own out of jail. There’s a nice set piece at the end, and the film is easy to watch and almost always enjoyable, but more than two hours is really just pushing it.

Robots – Enjoyable, if forgettable film from the animation studio that brought you Ice Age. Of course, that means it’s the same animation studio that isn’t Pixar, Disney or Dreamworks, but in the animated film business, you grab the points that you can. The film follows Rodney Copperbottom, a young robot who dreams of travelling to the big city to become an inventor, but runs into trouble when he finds that his hero has dissappeared, and a ruthless elitist robot has taken over. Occasionally funny, but to be honest, I get most of my (non-Pixar) animation enjoyment from guessing the voices.

Savannah Smiles – A nostalgic movie for me that I actually didn’t remember most of. A six year old girl runs away from her rich home because of the lack of attention she gets from her parents, and winds up with a couple of criminal losers who are mistaken for kidnappers. There are some funny moments, but its biggest feat is that it’s not too overly sentimental, given the amount of glurge. Writer and star Mark Miller thankfully thought that the humorous situations (and brief tension) should hold it’s own against the sentiment.

The Searchers – John Ford’s classic western finds Ethan (John Wayne) spending several years searching for a Comanche tribe that kidnapped his niece. The film is well known as an excellent western, with gorgeous scenery and a good story. The film also has many levels that would help repeat viewing, and can be a lot of quality fun. But there are a few points on which it doesn’t fare so well. For one, dare I say it, John Wayne is not a good actor. He’s too emotionally detatched from everything unless he remains silent and focused. Even the great lines just kind of fall off his tongue, with no conviction. Secondly, the character he plays, which I assume was meant to be the hero, is a real bastard. Finally, emphasizing that fact, the whole movie is ridiculously racist and politically incorrect. Although at the time that might have been passsable, it makes it hard to justify it as must-see western.

Stagecoach – This classic western shows that John Ford was destined to direct westerns. How? Because the action that I’ve come to expect of westerns is really good, whereas the drama that I expect more from chick flicks is pretty lame. Yes, the movie kicks into gear a little too late for my taste, but when it does, it’s actually pretty nifty. The film also boasts a few good performances (most notably the young John Wayne), good effects and choreography, and at least watchability during the times when it is isn’t flat out marvelous.

Stay Alive – Pretty dreadful horror film that attempts to meld the current Japanese inspired horror trend and the video game boom. You could blame the fact that the production company wanted a PG-13 rating for the films general lack of good gore and true scares. But it’s more likely that the film isn’t any good because of the script: The end is enormously forgettable and several deaths (and a non-death) are poorly explained, even cheating as far as the film’s reality is. There’s also the fact that Countess Bathory, the film’s villain, apparently lived in New Orleans during her factual terrifying reign, as opposed to Romania. A film this hesitant to fact check or even make sense is insulting.

The Towering Inferno – Irwin Allen’s second disaster film (after The Poseidon Adventure, which I love) is not something I thought highly of, as I had seen it before and didn’t care for it one way or another. But on my most recent viewing, that opinion changed, because I now think very highly of it. It’s got it’s fair share of ham-fisted moments and crappy dialog, but it does have a few great things going for it. For one, Steve McQueen and Paul Newman are great leads, adding just the right touch of humanity to what would otherwise have been supermen roles. For another, the effects and sets are rather good. Thirdly, the supporting cast is usually believeable and humanistic, making characters that you may actually care about. Finally, and most importantly, the film clearly has a deep admiration for fire fighters, most notable in the heroic but realistic portrayal by McQueen. They are portrayed as real men who sacrifice themselves because of the short-sightedness of others, putting themselves in harm’s way selflessly. This film is a tribute to them at heart, as opposed to just in writing.

The Train – John Frankenheimer’s action film stars Burt Lancaster as a French railworker at the end of the Nazi occupation of France. When a stubborn general (Paul Schofield, who needs a hat to make me not see him as Thomas Moore from A Man for All Seasons) decides to try and take France’s most prized art with him, Lancaster and his crew decide to stop the train at all costs. It’s effective, but a little confusing at times, and there are more than a few moments of greatness and creativity.

The Wrong Guys – I never saw it, but I remember the trailer from when I was a kid, and I remember wanting to see it. In some ways, I wish I had seen it at 8 years old, because then it would have been funny. Louie (Louie Anderson), Belz (Richard Belzer), Rich (Richard Lewis), Franklyn (Franklyn Ajaye) and Tim (Tim Thomerson) are adults who try to relive their cub scout glory days. The fact that they are all named after their real names is awkward. The supporting cast (including Josh Saviano, Jonathan Brandis, Art LaFleur and Brion James) is semi-interesting. John Goodman, as Duke Earle, is passable, and the hackneyed story-telling and limited acting shops of the cast are terrible. Worst of all, Richard Lewis is annoying beyond belief as a Jewish neurotic. It’s fairly hard to find, and it’s completely not worth it.

The Wrong Man – Alfred Hitchcock’s first (and only?) movie based on a true story has some nice moments of tension and an oddly understated performance from Henry Fonda. Fonda plays a man who’s life is torn apart when he is accused of a crime that was actually committed by a look-alike. It’s a good Hitchcock film, although the true story aspect is a little emphasized, and even then it sometimes feels awfully forced, but it can still grab you and/or depress you when it kicks into full gear.

X-Men: The Last Stand – The third film in the X-Men series is, dare I say it, actually pretty good. Hack director Brett Rattner had every reason to fail, and he does lose the humanity and emotion that the previous installments had, but he makes up for it in spectacle. In that, it’s actually a really good thrid film in the series, ending it with a bag, although a superficial one. The effects are occassionally shoddy, as is the editing, but it doesn’t really mar the overall excitement of the production.

Why new movies are better than older ones...

Blade Runner – Ridley Scott’s cult classic sci-fi film from1982 follows a cop (Harrison Ford) as he tries to track down and kill some replicants, cyborgs that are almost undistinguishable from humans, and no longer legal on earth. The film has some interesting things to say about the essence of humankind and mortality, and has some good, but not over-bearing special effects. I didn’t find it to be worth quite the subcultural greatness bestowed upon it, but at least I understand why.

Children of Men - I knew only the barest of story when I saw this, and because of my immense enjoyment of it, I won’t lay out any plot here. But what I will tell you is that if you like dystopian future films, or felt that Escape From New York would have been better if it wasn’t as cheap-ish and toungue-in-cheek, then by all means, see this movie. It’s very enjoyable, very raw, and it does make you think on occasion.

Fear No Evil – Another low-budget Saturday Nite Frights offering. In this one, two women team up to destroy the incarnate of Lucifer, who is a smart high schooler. Too many stupid moments mar an otherwise average horror film, which has a strangely popular soundtrack, including the Boomtown Rats’ “I Don’t Like Mondays,” which is used rather awkwardly given the song’s subject matter.

The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy – Well, it’s not terrible, and that’s about as good as comes out of it. The big screen version of the cult classic novel has it’s casting and production down well, but it fails anyway. People who do know the book are likely to be peeved by the useless addenda the filmmaker’s added (even if Douglas Adams approved of them), and the film’s general lack of either fun or humor, two essential elements of the book. Those not familiar will likely find it to be too senseless and needlessly quirky, all while holding on to the afformentioned lack of humor and fun. It was a hard movie to do, and an untested film director(s) was not the one to try and beat the odds.

I Am a Fugitive From a Chain Gang – A Best Picture nominee (one of ten) from 1932, this is the story of amn who is wrongly imprisoned, subjected to the terror of a chain gang, escapes and proves himself to be a model citizen, only to find his past catching up with him. It wasn’t exactly exciting, but it wasn’t boring either. It picked up a little steam after it was over, when I realized it was based on a true story, but I’ve never thought that a movie should get props for that reason only. It’s okay, but there’s no reason to actively search it out.

Inside Man – Spike Lee’s bank heist flick is consistently engaging and thoroughly enjoyable. Denzel Washington is a detective trying to figure out what is going on inside a bank where robber Clive Owen is trapped. But Owen seems to be a few steps ahead of them the whole time, in a robbery that may not be as obvious as it at first seems. The acting is good and the characters are clever, and although the ending didn’t excite me as much as it should have, its hard to hold that against it.

Pan’s Labyrinth – Guillermo del Toro’s newest film concerns a girl caught in the turmoil of Spain during World War II, where she is the regrettable guest of a brutal army captain. But she finds solace in a fairy tale come to life, as she is convinved by a faun that she may be the legendary princess that a king lost track of long ago. Parts of it are truly miraculous and are constantly held in stark contrast to the terror surrounding her everyday life. It’s wasn’t as fantasy-based as I had been led to believe, and although I didn’t love it as much as I had wanted to, I was still very impressed and would recommend it wholeheartedly to almost any adult who could believe in fairy tales given enough instigation.

Satan’s Cheerleaders – A group of cheerleaders find themselves at the mercy of a cult of devil worshippers, but none of them are any match for terrible acting and a ludicrous script. Not even being so bad it’s funny, the film is truly terrible in a myriad of ways. On the imdb, it's listed as comedy then horror, but I get the feeling that wasn't the intention when they started filming. I saw it for free on the local cable channel, and yet I still want my money back.

She – Weird, but nostalgic fantasy. I saw this at a young age, and only recently saw it again thanks to Saturday Nite Frights. Two losers travel the post-apocalyptic landscape with the aid of a female queen, She, in attempt to capture their kidnapped sister. It’s low budget, but ecclectic, featuring plenty of at-least creative monsters, such as mini-Gods, vampires, lepers, and an incredible memorable regenerating Groucho Marx wannabe. As bad as it is, it’s a lot of fun.

A Very Special Post

I was hoping that this post would be special because I was able to sustain my movie-a-day watching all through January. Alas, that is not the case, as I fell five short by my count (two were Best Pictures, if you are keeping track). No, this one is special because of where I am. I finally made the leap and got the internet at home, and currently, I am sitting in my living room and watching CSI. Well, if anything will help with my utter lack of a life, I'm pretty sure getting the internet stopped it.

Animal House – Both crude and occasionally smart, Animal House is one of the most popular comedies ever made. It’s also the definitive comedy for anyone who ever went to college. It’s not brilliantly made, and God knows that without John Belushi it would likely be a little more than passable, but the film is almost always funny, always quote-able and never less than entertaining.

Best in Show – The second Christopher Guest mockumentary starring the usual gang is a stab at dog shows and, more specifically, their owners. As usual, there are a few laugh-out-loud moments, but I like it much less than Waiting For Guffman and probably A Mighty Wind, if only because I find the very concept of dog shows dull and their owners, in general, insulting and upsetting. But Best in Show is the only dog-show movie that I could ever stand behind, even if its with a little bit of hesitance.

Blue Monkey – A little girl and her friends walk through the tunnel underneath a hospital, as a giant carniverous insect looms nearby. Wondering what they’ll find, the girl says “Maybe it’s a big blue monkey.” That little bit of cleverness (the only reference to monkeys) is about the only little kick I got from this flick. A cheap, ridiculous Alien knock-off, Blue Monkey does have some interesting B-list stars, including Steve Railsbeck, John Vernon, Joe Flaherty and Sarah Polley (the young girl I believe). It’s pointless, and only somewhat entertaining, alternating between bad horror and cheap tongue-in-cheek humor.

Borat – A few years ago, I watched Tango & Cash for the first time and found myself bothered by thoughts about how the cops had to get fired or worse for the stunts they pulled. Maybe that’s what bothers me about Borat. To be fair, I am big fan of Da Ali G Show, and was totally looking forward to this film. And I did laugh a lot, finding it tremendously funny. But it left a bad feeling in my stomach too. This might be, like Tango, due to the fact that I fell out of the movie’s scope and started thinking about how in the hell he got out of some of the situations I put him in. Or maybe its because the movie feels a bit too long. Or maybe, just maybe, it’s because the character of Borat was my least favorite of Sacha Baron Cohen’s characters. Ali G tackles popular or political figures who should know better. Bruno attacks the ripe fashion indusrty people. But Borat unleashes his menace on normal people, putting them (and us) into uncomfortable situations, and catching otherwise innocent people doing ridiculously stupid things. I can’t feel too bad for them as they know they are on camera, but given the editing, Cohen certainly has the ability to make them look stupid, mean or both. Anybody could fall for it, and most of us would, and I can’t get too much of a good feeling from it. Like I said, I think Cohen is very funny, and Ali G is a hoot. And while Borat made me laugh as much as any movie this year (barring maybe Little Miss Sunshine), I felt bad about it. I’m not easily offended. In fact, I can’t think of another movie that ever offended me, but Borat did, at least a little bit.

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory – There’s a lot to like in Tim Burton’s adaptation of the Roald Dahl novel. Whereas the original film was an acid trip of a kid’s movie, Burton’s is much more beautiful yet unsettling. A quintet of kids goes on atrip through a miraculous chocolate Factory, they find themselves picked off one by one based on thei own personal flaws and vices. Gene Wilder’s trippy Willy Wonka is replaced by Johnny Depp’s malevolent, insecure and hilarious performance, and the film looks much better to boot.

Dog Day Afternoon – Sidney Lumet’s classic from 1975 finds two losers holding up a bank, while a circus erupts outside. The film is both entertaining and sad, and the performances are compelling, especially Al Pacino in the lead, and John Cazale brining his always impressive supporting performance. If you haven’t seen it, you should be very impressed by the events as they unfold. And although the film doesn’t hold up as well on repeat viewings, it’s a perfect film to represent the time and place in took place during.


Dog Soldiers
– The first film from the maker of The Descent, this film follows a group of soldiers-in-training who run into a slight werewolf problem. It’s actually pretty terrific for a low budget horror movie, and the kind of film that’s probably a real find if you happen to have just stumbled across it in the video store.

Finding Nemo – I use to think this film was good, but a bit overrated. Watching it again, I realized that it’s better than I thought; It’s hilarious in parts, touching in others, and never less than fascinating and beautiful. It took me a little too long to realize what many people already knew.

I Heart Huckabees – Definitely original. A poet trying to find meaning behind some co